Exploration of Effective Spatial Performance of Accessible Neighbourhood Green (Ang), Including its Proportion and Standard Distance from User in Dhanmondi Residential Area, Dhaka
Keywords:Neighbourhood Green, Accessibility, Proximity, Spatial Performance, Liveability
Urban physical context can be analyzed across three key matrixes (3-P) among others i.e. place, path, and people. So, pragmatic analysis of spatial effective performances connecting 3-P, require provoking frequency of people’s experience. Acknowledging this issue, the demand for accessible neighbourhood green (ANG) at an appropriate distance becomes the primary concern to enhance the quality of life and liveability in a city. However, with the continued urban growth and densification, the discrepancy between the demand and supply of open space continues to vary requiring adjustments to remain responsive. The real-life circumstance results in a shortage of parks and open areas in terms of demand and supply within accessible distance in Dhaka city. This paper intends to examine this issue through the case of the planned Dhanmondi Residential Area (DRA) in Dhaka. Despite having provision of multiple open spaces in DRA, visitor’s frequency varies due to age and gender group accessibility conditions and varying distances. Considering existing spatial norms set by Detail Area Plan (DAP), Dhaka structure plan (DSP), and numerous research works on Dhaka open spaces, the major inquiry posed here is whether these open spaces are appropriate for DRA or not. Therefore, the objective of this paper focuses on examining the quality of the physical environment of Neighbourhood public open spaces termed here as accessible neighbourhood green (ANG) in DRA to examine their adequacy concerning proportion and distance synchronized with the frequency of visits. The initial part of the paper focuses on conceptualizing the problem vis-à-vis the existing scenario. Surveys and interviews have been conducted to assess people’s perceptions in terms of comfort, accessibility, sociability, and user frequency aligned with proximity. The result indicates that the provision of one appropriate ANG within two or three standard blocks apart contribute to enhancing the quality of life for the city dwellers and their liveability.
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Statistics and Informatics Division (SID), Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh (2013). District Statistics 2011 Dhaka. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS).
Bosch, M.A. van den, et al. (2015). Development of an urban green space indicator and the public health rationale. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 44(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494815615444
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public Places Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design (2nd Edition). Elsevier Ltd.
‘Dhaka Structure Plan 2016-2035’ (2016).
EIU Survey: Dhaka ranked second least liveable city (2018, August 15). The Daily Star. Retrieved from https://www.thedailystar.net/news/city/dhaka-second-least-liveable-city-in-the-world-1620577#:~:text=Dhaka%20is%20the%20second%20least,Economist%20Intelligence%20Unit%20(EIU)
Herzele, A.V., & Wiedemann, T. (2003). A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00192-5
Islam, M.M., Kawsar, M.A., & Ahmed, R.U. (2002). Open space in Dhaka city: A study on the use of parks in the Dhaka city corporation area. Unpublished BURP thesis, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka.
Mahabub-Un-Nabi, A.S.M., & Hashem, M. (2007). Trends of development in Dhanmondi. In: Jahan, S., & Maniruzzamann K.M. (Eds.), Urbanization in Bangladesh - Patterns, Issues and Approaches to Planning. Bangladesh Institut of Planners, Dhaka, pp. 36–42.
Mirsch, N. (2002). Part IV : Park Definitions & Development Standards, pp. 1–17.
Mowla, Q.A. (2005). Eco-design concept in the design and management of Dhaka’s urban open spaces. In XXII World Congress of Architecture, uia2005istanbul International seminar on Cities- Grand Bazaar of Architectures (sub-theme: Urban Ecology). 3-7 July 2005, Istanbul, Turkey. 233-238.
Nielsen, T.S., & Hansen, K.B. (2007). Do green areas affect health? Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators. Health & Place, 13(4), 839–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.02.001
Suchana, S.B. (2013). Identification and performance evaluation of Christopher Alexander’s Pattern 60 in the context of urban Dhaka for liveability. M. Arch Thesis, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET).
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Ishrat Badhan and S.W. Ching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the Journal of Creative Space (Creat. Sp.) by Chitkara University Publications are Open Access articles that are published with licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- CC-BY 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://cs.chitkara.edu.in. This license permits one to use, remix, tweak and reproduction in any medium, even commercially provided one give credit for the original creation.
View Legal Code of the above-mentioned license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
View Licence Deed here https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
|Journal of Creative Space by Chitkara University Publications is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://cs.chitkara.edu.in/|