Compare and Contrast the Two Approaches: The ‘Conventional Approach’ and the ‘Computational Approach’ Described by Stiny and Mitchell 1978, for Analyzing an Architectural Style

  • Nujaba Binte Kabir Department of Architecture, The Ahsanullah University of Science & Technology, Dhaka
Keywords: Architectural historians, Computational analysis, Conventional analysis

Abstract

Architectural historians have focused more on traditional analysis of a style on the basis of concept, compositional order, construction method, structural system and much more. This approach can be called as ‘Conventional approach’. On the other hand the ‘Computational approach’, which was described by George Stiny and William J. Mitchell in 1978, can regenerate new design of a particular style by analyzing the characteristics of that style. The question is how these two approaches conflict with each other and how they can be compared with each other. The aim of this paper is to find out Keywords: the differences and comparisons between these two approaches with explanation of some examples.

References

Attilio, P. (1997). Gardens in the Time of the Great Muslim Empires: Theoryand Design.

New York: Brill: Leiden.

Conan, M. (1999). Perspectives on Garden Histories. Washington, D.C : Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.

Elizabeth B. M. (2000). The Moonlight Garden : New Discoveries at the Taj Mahal. Washington, D.C: Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian Institution and the University of Washington Press, Seattle and London.

Flemming, U. (1987). More than the Sum of Parts: the Grammar of Queen Anne Houses. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 14, 323–350.

Koch, E. (2001). Mughal Art and Imperial Ideology: Collected Essays. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Koning, H, and Eizenberg, J. (1981). The Language of the Prairie: Frank Lloyd Wright’s Prairie Houses. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 8, 295–323.

Massey, J. C. (1996). House Styles in America: the Old-house Journal Guide to the Architecture of American Homes. New York, N.Y: Penguin Studio.

Quinan, J. (2004). Frank Lloyd Wright’s Martin House: Architecture as Portraiture. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

Siry, J. (1996). Unity Temple: Frank Lloyd Wright and Architecture for Liberal Religion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stiny, G, and Mitchell, W. J. (1978).The Palladian Grammar, Environment and planning B: planning and design, 5, 5–18.

Stiny, G. (1980). Introduction to Shape and Shape Grammars. Environment and planning B: planning and design, 7, 343–351.

Stiny, G. and Mitchell, W. J. (1980). The Grammar of Paradise: on the Generation of Mughal Gardens. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 7, 209–226.
Published
2019-07-11
How to Cite
Nujaba Binte Kabir. (2019). Compare and Contrast the Two Approaches: The ‘Conventional Approach’ and the ‘Computational Approach’ Described by Stiny and Mitchell 1978, for Analyzing an Architectural Style. Creative Space, 7(1), 19-34. Retrieved from https://cs.chitkara.edu.in/index.php/cs/article/view/163
Section
Articles