Creat. Sp.

Mapping: A Speculative and Creative Design Tool

Khalilah Zakariya, Mazlina Mansor and Nor Zalina Harun

KEYWORDS

Mapping; Design; Design Research; Architecture; Landscape Architecture

PUBLISHED DATE July 2015
PUBLISHER The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at www.chitkara.edu.in/publications
INTRODUCTION

Maps are utilitarian in nature. The use of maps as graphical documentation for recording a setting date back to the prehistoric periods and the early civilizations(Harmon, 2004). Maps normally convey information about a geographical location or about other places, to aid the understanding of space and physical phenomena (Harmon & Clemans, 2009; Pillai, 2013). In the built environment, mapping is employed as a method to record spatial data that can reveal certain patterns or distributions of a subject. Within the last fifteen to twenty years, several designers, planners and artists have challenged the conventions of mapping just as data representation and have exploredits usefulness as part of a critical thinking process. In The Agency of Mapping, Corner (2011) argues that mapping should reveal something new, rather than as an ‘unimaginative, analytical practice’. Bustamante (2008) debates a similar idea, where he asserts that ‘the making of a map has to offer critical interpretation and serve as stimuli for the production of new scenarios.’Mapping, like designing, also should act as a way of operating.

The application of mapping as a method of inquiry in the field of design and the built environment is not new. Various designers, artists, scholars and the researchers have implemented mapping as an alternative method to interrogate a site. However, the techniques of mapping have evolved over the years. A combination of creative representations of mapping generates a different kind of interrogation. Rather than merely a display of generic data, mapping becomes a design process in its nature, which can stimulate design thinking.

This article draws on three examples of mapping techniques applicable to the Built Environment Studios (Architecture, Landscape Architecture, Urban Design, Planning). These techniques are ‘Observing’, ‘Following’, and ‘Representing’. A literature review of mapping and the types of mapping are examined to give an overview of the subject matter and address their values in the design field. This article starts by situating mapping as a speculative method of inquiry for aiding the design process. The consequent sub-sections explain three techniques of mapping: Observing, Following, and Representing. The final section concludes the implication of the mapping techniques in architecture education and design thinking.

ABSTRACT

Mapping is a technique used to record and represent information graphically. In the studios made forarchitecture and landscape architecture, mapping is usually conducted at the Inventory-making and Analysis stage. Data from the site is gathered and documented for further investigation. However, mapping can also become a creative tool to ‘reveal’ certain things or invisible processes. It can encourage the designers to speculate the site and the design from different perspectives and at multiple scales. This paper discusses some mapping projects that have been explored by the authors through their research projects. The aim of this paper is to recommend mapping as a creative and speculative design tool that can make data more engaging to design thinking.

Page(s) 1–12
URL http://dspace.chitkara.edu.in/jspui/bitstream/1/606/3/31001_CS_Khalilah.pdf
ISSN Print : 2321-3892, Online : 2321-7154
DOI 10.15415/cs.2015.31001
CONCLUSION

Mapping plays an important role in revealing what a place has, how it works and how people utilise it. It also opens up possibilities of where and how the designers might intervene. As discussed in the three techniques, mapping can expose the qualities and relationships between people, spaces, services, infrastructure and conditions. The way we represent a map can also offer multiple readings of the place. A multi-method approach to examining spaces in the built environment is critical for designers and researchers. It allows places to be seen with a ‘fresher set of eyes.’ Site inventory and analysis are a common method used by designers and design students to record elements that exist at a site and document how users occupy the site. From the potentials and constraints identified through this process, design becomes a ‘solution’ to the site’s needs. However, to unpack more about the place beyond how it appears, we need to adopt other techniques that can reveal their intangible and invisible characteristics. The mapping techniques discussed in this paper, among others, are extensions of the conventional methods of collecting, representing and examining data. They provide alternative ways for designers and students to see and evaluate space and place.

REFERENCES
  • BECKER, H. S. (1998) Trick of the Trade: How to Think about Your Research While You’re Doing It. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • BOOTH, N. K. (1983) Basic Elements of Landscape Architectural Design. New York: Elsevier.
  • BUSTAMANTE, C. T. (2008) Reformulating Urban Landscapes: Figure-ground Maps. In Proceedings from the Subtropical Cities Conference. Available from: http://works.bepress.com/ctorresb/2. [Accessed: 16 April 2015]
  • CAQUARD, S., & CARTWRIGHT, W. (2014) Narrative cartography: From mapping stories to the narrative of maps and mapping. The Cartographic Journal. 51(2). p.101–106.
  • CARERI, F. (2002) Walkscapes. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
  • COLLINS, H. (2010) Creative Research: The Theory and Practice of Research for the Creative Industries. Lausanne: AVA Publishing SA.
  • CORNER, J. (2011) The Agency of Mapping: Speculation, Critique and Invention. In KITCHIN, R. & DODGE, M. (eds.) The Map Reader: Theories of Mapping Practice and Cartographic Representation . Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell
  • CRA WHALL, N. (2003) Giving New Voice to Endangered Cultures. Santo Domingo: UNESCO
  • DENSCOMBE, M. (2007) The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research projects. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
  • GOLICNIK, B., & WARDTHOMPSON, C. (2010) Emerging relationships between design and use of urban park spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning. 94(1). p.38–53.
  • GROAT, L. & WANG, D. (2013) Architectural Research Methods (2nd ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • HARMON, K. (2004) You Are Here: Personal Geographies and Other Maps of the Imagination. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  • HARMON, K., & CLEMANS G. (2009) The Map as Art: Contemporary Artists Explore Cartography. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  • HOLLOWAY, I., BROWN, L., & SHIPWAY, R. (2010) Meaning not measurement: Using ethnography to bring a deeper understanding to the participant experience of festivals and events. International Journal of Event and Festival Management. 1. p.74–85.
  • LYNCH, K. (1960) The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • MATHUR, A. & DACUNHA, D. (2009)SOAK: Mumbai in an Estuary. New Delhi: Rupa & Co.
  • MCHARG, I. (1992) Design with Nature. New York: John Wiley.
  • MOGEL, L. & BHAGAT, A. (2010) An Atlas of Radical Cartography. Los Angeles: Journal of Aesthetic & Protest Press.
  • PILLAI, J. (2013) Cultural Mapping. Petaling Jaya: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre.
  • SADLER, S. (1998) The Situationist City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • SIMONDS, J. O., & STARKE, B. W. (2006) Landscape architecture: A manual of environmental planning and design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • STEINER, F. (1991) The Living Landscape: An Ecological Approach to Landscape Planning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • TREIB, M. (1980) Mapping Experience (Design Quarterly). Minnesota: Walker Art Center
  • TUFTE, E. R. (1990) Envisioning Information. Connecticut: Graphics Press.
  • WASSERMAN, K. (2007) The Book as Art: Artists’ Books from the National Museum of Women in the Arts. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  • WILEY, D. (2008) A walk about the city: Stalker, the transurbance and the city map. Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies.
  • ZAKARIYA, K. (2012) Fleeting feast: Mapping and accommodating temporary markets (Unpublished doctoral thesis). RMIT University Melbourne, Australia.
  • ZEISEL, J. (1984) Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behavior Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.